Mese: Luglio 2021
Léctio libri Sapiéntiæ
Eccli 24:14-16
Ab inítio et ante sǽcula creáta sum, et usque ad futúrum sǽculum non désinam, et in habitatióne sancta coram ipso ministrávi. Et sic in Sion firmáta sum, et in civitáte sanctificáta simíliter requiévi, et in Ierúsalem potéstas mea. Et radicávi in pópulo honorificáto, et in parte Dei mei heréditas illíus, et in plenitúdine sanctórum deténtio mea.
Luc 11:27-28
In illo témpore: Loquénte Iesu ad turbas, extóllens vocem quædam múlier de turba, dixit illi: Beátus venter, qui te portávit, et úbera, quæ suxísti. At ille dixit: Quinímmo beáti, qui áudiunt verbum Dei, et custódiunt illud.
OMELIA DI DON ENRICO RONCAGLIA
«Beato il seno che ti ha portato e il petto che ti ha nutrito». Vogliamo essere vicino alla nostra Madre Celeste che viene insultata ogni giorno proprio dalla falsa chiesa. Ieri, giorno della festa della Madonna, Bergoglio, il falso papa e falso vicario di Cristo, ha emesso un decreto contro la liturgia del Vetus Ordo. Si tratta di un atto eretico e sacrilego. Viene proibito criticare Bergoglio il falso papa eretico e anticristo che la Madonna ha chiamato l’Impostore, criticare il Concilio Vaticano II e criticare il Novus Ordo di Paolo VI.
Ma noi continuiamo con il nostro amore a Maria e il nostro amore al vero papa Benedetto XVI, il Vicario di Cristo! L’Impostore sta preparando la strada per l’anticristo.
I seguaci di Don Stefano Gobbi, gli aderenti al Movimento Sacerdotale Mariano, hanno aderito a questi principi: amore alla Madonna, amore al vero papa Benedetto XVI e amore all’eucarestia.
Sia lodato Gesu’ Cristo!
HOMILY BY DON ENRICO RONCAGLIA
“Blessed are the breasts that bore you and the breasts that fed you.” We want to be close to our Heavenly Mother who is being insulted every day by the very false church. Yesterday, the day of the feast of Our Lady, Bergoglio, the false pope and the false Vicar of Jesus Christ, issued a decree against the liturgy of the Vetus Ordo. It is a heretical and sacrilegious act. It is forbidden to criticize Bergoglio, the false heretical and antichrist pope whom Our Lady called the Imposter, to criticize the Second Vatican Council and to criticize the Novus Ordo of Paul VI. But we continue with our love for Mary and our love for the true Pope Benedict XVI, the Vicar of Christ! The impostor is preparing the way for the antichrist. The followers of Don Stefano Gobbi, the adherents of the Marian Priestly Movement, adhered to these principles: love for the Madonna, love for the true Pope Benedict XVI and love for the Eucharist.
Praised be Jesus Christ!
E qualcuno (spinto evidentemente dallo stesso Demonio) oserebbe ancora sostenere che il Demonio non sarebbe in grado di entrare nella nostra mente per indurci in tentazione?
Lo puo’ fare specialmente quanto preghiamo! (*)
Per questo chiediamo l’aiuto e la protezione anche a San Michele Arcangelo!
_____________________
(*) vedasi:
IL DEMONIO RIESCE A CAPIRE I NOSTRI PENSIERI?https://www.proselitismodellascienza.it/2021/06/15/il-demonio-riesce-a-capire-i-nostri
Oggi sabato 17 luglio, dalle ore 5.47 alle ore 6.33: Rosario del Dolore, Adorazione e consacrazione del Preziosissimo Sangue, Adorazione del Sacro Capo di Gesu’ e Litaniae Lauretanae.
Per la Catena di Preghiera del Piccolo Resto e la Crociata di Preghiera della Vergine della Rivelazione.
O BVM, Nostra Madre, ti ringraziamo della tua protezione, aiuto e ispirazione.
Affinche’ la nostra fede in Gesù Cristo sia incrollabile, affinché crediamo nel suo insegnamento e che la via della croce seguita da Gesu’ sia la via della salvezza, l’unica strada della Redenzione.
Ti preghiamo o Vergine della Rivelazione per la conversione degli atei, dei cristiani senza fede e dei non cristiani.
In cambio di ogni conversione manda in cielo un’anima del Limbo!
Why do you insist in calling him Pope? He is no pope (he never was one) because he is the “Impostor” announced by the Virgin Mary! (*)
The Bergoglio’s Motu Proprio ‘Traditiones Custodes,’ is just a blasphemous and heretical contradiction of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI’s 2007 document ‘Summorum Pontificum.‘
And, pay attention, all criticism like the present one is susceptible of punishment according to the New Canon Law recently approved by Bergoglio.
Now you can be punished for speaking against pronounced politics or heresy like the present one!
We, the Small Remnant of the Church, must now fight back the Impostor!
__________________________
(*) SULLE PROFEZIE DELLA BVM A PINO AURICCHIA RIGUARDO ALL’IMPOSTORE (ABOUT THE PROPHECIES OF THE VIRGIN MARY TO PINO AURICCHIA ON THE IMPOSTOR) https://www.proselitismodellascienza.it/2021/06/23/sulle-profezie-di-pino-auricchia-sullimpostore/
(**)
LA PROFEZIA CHE SVELA IL NOME DELL’ANTICRISTO E IL MARCHIO DELLA BESTIA
Evangelium Lc 11,27-28
Beati piuttosto coloro che ascoltano la parola di Dio.
In quel tempo, mentre Gesù parlava, una donna dalla folla alzò la voce e gli disse: «Beato il grembo che ti ha portato e il seno che ti ha allattato!». Ma egli disse: «Beati piuttosto coloro che ascoltano la parola di Dio e la osservano!».
OMELIA DI DON ENRICO RONCAGLIA
Il Monte Carmelo e’ noto come Monte di Maria.
In Lei ci rifugiamo!. Il nostro rifugio e’ Maria, il suo Cuore Immacolato e il Santo Rosario pregato ogni giorno!
I frutti del giardino di Maria, i doni di Maria, sono i doni dello Spirito Santo!
Ma dobbiamo combattere! L’anti-papa ha annullato il Motu Proprio “Summorum Pontificum” di Benedetto XVI! Si tratta di una incredibile blasfemia! La falsa chiesa bergogliana si oppone al Vetus Ordo!
Si tratta di capire come i tradizionalisti che restano seguaci dell’anti-papa. La messa moderna (di Paolo VI) e’ sterile e non porta all’incontro con Dio!
Ma vincera’ Maria non c’e’ dubbio!
Sia lodato Gesu Cristo!
HOMILY BY DON ENRICO RONCAGLIA
Mount Carmel is known as Mount of Mary. In her we take refuge !. Our refuge is Mary, her Immaculate Heart and the Holy Rosary prayed every day! The fruits of Mary’s garden, the gifts of Mary, are the gifts of the Holy Spirit! But we have to fight!
The anti-pope canceled Benedict XVI’s Motu Proprio “Summorum Pontificum”!
This is an incredible blasphemy!
The false Bergoglian church opposes the Vetus Ordo!
It is a question of understanding how the traditionalists who remain followers of the anti-pope.
The modern Mass (of Paul VI) is sterile and does not lead to an encounter with God!
But Maria will win there is no doubt!
Praised be Jesus Christ!
Lectio
Léctio Epístolæ beáti Pauli Apóstoli ad Romános
Rom 6:19-23
Fratres: Humánum dico, propter infirmitátem carnis vestræ: sicut enim exhibuístis membra vestra servíre immundítiæ et iniquitáti ad iniquitátem, ita nunc exhibéte membra vestra servíre iustítiæ in sanctificatiónem. Cum enim servi essétis peccáti, líberi fuístis iustítiæ. Quem ergo fructum habuístis tunc in illis, in quibus nunc erubéscitis? Nam finis illórum mors est. Nunc vero liberáti a peccáto, servi autem facti Deo, habétis fructum vestrum in sanctificatiónem, finem vero vitam ætérnam. Stipéndia enim peccáti mors. Grátia autem Dei vita ætérna, in Christo Iesu, Dómino nostro.
This is in reply to the latest dramatic developments (1) in which THE ANTI-POPE FORBIDS HIS FOLLOWERS THE ANCIENT MASS, EXCEPT WITH SPECIAL PERMISSION!
Dear brothers in faith we have to ask the special protection of the Virgin Mary because we have to fight for the freedom of faith in the Church!
This must be the end of the fake Anti-pope! We must ask him to leave the church and the Vatican at once!
______________________________________________________
(1) APOSTOLIC LETTER ISSUED “MOTU PROPRIO” BY THE SUPREME PONTIFF FRANCIS “TRADITIONIS CUSTODES” ON THE USE OF THE ROMAN LITURGY PRIOR TO THE REFORM OF 1970
Guardians of the tradition, the bishops in communion with the Bishop of Rome constitute the visible principle and foundation of the unity of their particular Churches.[1] Under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, through the proclamation of the Gospel and by means of the celebration of the Eucharist, they govern the particular Churches entrusted to them.[2]
In order to promote the concord and unity of the Church, with paternal solicitude towards those who in any region adhere to liturgical forms antecedent to the reform willed by the Vatican Council II, my Venerable Predecessors, Saint John Paul II and Benedict XVI, granted and regulated the faculty to use the Roman Missal edited by John XXIII in 1962.[3] In this way they intended “to facilitate the ecclesial communion of those Catholics who feel attached to some earlier liturgical forms” and not to others.[4]
In line with the initiative of my Venerable Predecessor Benedict XVI to invite the bishops to assess the application of the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum three years after its publication, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith carried out a detailed consultation of the bishops in 2020. The results have been carefully considered in the light of experience that has matured during these years.
At this time, having considered the wishes expressed by the episcopate and having heard the opinion of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, I now desire, with this Apostolic Letter, to press on ever more in the constant search for ecclesial communion. Therefore, I have considered it appropriate to establish the following:
Art. 1. The liturgical books promulgated by Saint Paul VI and Saint John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of Vatican Council II, are the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.
Art. 2. It belongs to the diocesan bishop, as moderator, promoter, and guardian of the whole liturgical life of the particular Church entrusted to him,[5] to regulate the liturgical celebrations of his diocese.[6] Therefore, it is his exclusive competence to authorize the use of the 1962 Roman Missal in his diocese, according to the guidelines of the Apostolic See.
Art. 3. The bishop of the diocese in which until now there exist one or more groups that celebrate according to the Missal antecedent to the reform of 1970:
§ 1. is to determine that these groups do not deny the validity and the legitimacy of the liturgical reform, dictated by Vatican Council II and the Magisterium of the Supreme Pontiffs;
§ 2. is to designate one or more locations where the faithful adherents of these groups may gather for the eucharistic celebration (not however in the parochial churches and without the erection of new personal parishes);
§ 3. to establish at the designated locations the days on which eucharistic celebrations are permitted using the Roman Missal promulgated by Saint John XXIII in 1962.[7] In these celebrations the readings are proclaimed in the vernacular language, using translations of the Sacred Scripture approved for liturgical use by the respective Episcopal Conferences;
§ 4. to appoint a priest who, as delegate of the bishop, is entrusted with these celebrations and with the pastoral care of these groups of the faithful. This priest should be suited for this responsibility, skilled in the use of the Missale Romanum antecedent to the reform of 1970, possess a knowledge of the Latin language sufficient for a thorough comprehension of the rubrics and liturgical texts, and be animated by a lively pastoral charity and by a sense of ecclesial communion. This priest should have at heart not only the correct celebration of the liturgy, but also the pastoral and spiritual care of the faithful;
§ 5. to proceed suitably to verify that the parishes canonically erected for the benefit of these faithful are effective for their spiritual growth, and to determine whether or not to retain them;
§ 6. to take care not to authorize the establishment of new groups.
Art. 4. Priests ordained after the publication of the present Motu Proprio, who wish to celebrate using the Missale Romanum of 1962, should submit a formal request to the diocesan Bishop who shall consult the Apostolic See before granting this authorization.
Art. 5. Priests who already celebrate according to the Missale Romanum of 1962 should request from the diocesan Bishop the authorization to continue to enjoy this faculty.
Art. 6. Institutes of consecrated life and Societies of apostolic life, erected by the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, fall under the competence of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies for Apostolic Life.
Art. 7. The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments and the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, for matters of their particular competence, exercise the authority of the Holy See with respect to the observance of these provisions.
Art. 8. Previous norms, instructions, permissions, and customs that do not conform to the provisions of the present Motu Proprio are abrogated.
Everything that I have declared in this Apostolic Letter in the form of Motu Proprio, I order to be observed in all its parts, anything else to the contrary notwithstanding, even if worthy of particular mention, and I establish that it be promulgated by way of publication in “L’Osservatore Romano”, entering immediately in force and, subsequently, that it be published in the official Commentary of the Holy See, Acta Apostolicae Sedis.
Given at Rome, at Saint John Lateran, on 16 July 2021, the liturgical Memorial of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, in the ninth year of Our Pontificate.
FRANCIS
________________________
[1] Cfr Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Dogmatic Constitution on the Church “Lumen Gentium”, 21 november 1964, n. 23 AAS 57 (1965) 27.
[2] Cfr Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Dogmatic Constitution on the Church “Lumen Gentium”, 21 november 1964, n. 27: AAS 57 (1965) 32; Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Decree concerning the pastoral office of bishops in the Church “Christus Dominus”, 28 october 1965, n. 11: AAS 58 (1966) 677-678; Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 833.
[3] Cfr John Paul II, Apostolic Letter given Motu proprio “Ecclesia Dei”, 2 july 1988: AAS 80 (1988) 1495-1498; Benedict XVI, Apostolic Letter given Motu proprio “Summorum Pontificum”, 7 july 2007: AAS 99 (2007) 777-781; Apostolic Letter given Motu proprio “Ecclesiae unitatem”, 2 july 2009: AAS 101 (2009) 710-711.
[4] John Paul II, Apostolic Letter given Motu proprio “Ecclesia Dei”, 2 july 1988, n. 5: AAS 80 (1988) 1498.
[5] Cfr Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Costitution on the sacred liturgy “Sacrosanctum Concilium”, 4 december 1963, n. 41: AAS 56 (1964) 111; Caeremoniale Episcoporum, n. 9; Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacrament, Instruction on certain matters to be observed or to be avoided regarding the Most Holy Eucharist “Redemptionis Sacramentum”, 25 march 2004, nn. 19-25: AAS 96 (2004) 555-557.
[6] Cfr CIC, can. 375, § 1; can. 392.
[7] Cfr Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Decree “Quo magis” approving seven Eucharistic Prefaces for the forma extraordinaria of the Roman Rite, 22 february 2020, and Decree “Cum sanctissima” on the liturgical celebration in honour of Saints in the forma extraordinaria of the Roman Rite, 22 february 2020: L’Osservatore Romano, 26 march 2020, p. 6.
***
[Accompanying Letter]
Rome, 16 July 2021
Dear Brothers in the Episcopate,
Just as my Predecessor Benedict XVI did with Summorum Pontificum, I wish to accompany the Motu proprio Traditionis custodes with a letter explaining the motives that prompted my decision. I turn to you with trust and parresia, in the name of that shared “solicitude for the whole Church, that contributes supremely to the good of the Universal Church” as Vatican Council II reminds us.[1]
Most people understand the motives that prompted St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI to allow the use of the Roman Missal, promulgated by St. Pius V and edited by St. John XXIII in 1962, for the Eucharistic Sacrifice. The faculty — granted by the indult of the Congregation for Divine Worship in 1984[2] and confirmed by St. John Paul II in the Motu Proprio Ecclesia Dei in 1988[3] — was above all motivated by the desire to foster the healing of the schism with the movement of Mons. Lefebvre. With the ecclesial intention of restoring the unity of the Church, the Bishops were thus asked to accept with generosity the “just aspirations” of the faithful who requested the use of that Missal.
Many in the Church came to regard this faculty as an opportunity to adopt freely the Roman Missal promulgated by St. Pius V and use it in a manner parallel to the Roman Missal promulgated by St. Paul VI. In order to regulate this situation at the distance of many years, Benedict XVI intervened to address this state of affairs in the Church. Many priests and communities had “used with gratitude the possibility offered by the Motu proprio” of St. John Paul II. Underscoring that this development was not foreseeable in 1988, the Motu proprio Summorum Pontificum of 2007 intended to introduce “a clearer juridical regulation” in this area.[4] In order to allow access to those, including young people, who when “they discover this liturgical form, feel attracted to it and find in it a form, particularly suited to them, to encounter the mystery of the most holy Eucharist”,[5] Benedict XVI declared “the Missal promulgated by St. Pius V and newly edited by Blessed John XXIII, as a extraordinary expression of the same lex orandi”,granting a “more ample possibility for the use of the 1962 Missal”.[6]
In making their decision they were confident that such a provision would not place in doubt one of the key measures of Vatican Council II or minimize in this way its authority: the Motu proprio recognized that, in its own right, “the Missal promulgated by Paul VI is the ordinary expression of the lex orandi of the Catholic Church of the Latin rite”.[7] The recognition of the Missal promulgated by St. Pius V “as an extraordinary expression of the same lex orandi” did not in any way underrate the liturgical reform, but was decreed with the desire to acknowledge the “insistent prayers of these faithful,” allowing them “to celebrate the Sacrifice of the Mass according to the editio typica of the Roman Missal promulgated by Blessed John XXIII in 1962 and never abrogated, as the extraordinary form of the Liturgy of the Church”.[8] It comforted Benedict XVI in his discernment that many desired “to find the form of the sacred Liturgy dear to them,” “clearly accepted the binding character of Vatican Council II and were faithful to the Pope and to the Bishops”.[9] What is more, he declared to be unfounded the fear of division in parish communities, because “the two forms of the use of the Roman Rite would enrich one another”.[10] Thus, he invited the Bishops to set aside their doubts and fears, and to welcome the norms, “attentive that everything would proceed in peace and serenity,” with the promise that “it would be possible to find resolutions” in the event that “serious difficulties came to light” in the implementation of the norms “once the Motu proprio came into effect”.[11]
With the passage of thirteen years, I instructed the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to circulate a questionnaire to the Bishops regarding the implementation of the Motu proprio Summorum Pontificum. The responses reveal a situation that preoccupies and saddens me, and persuades me of the need to intervene. Regrettably, the pastoral objective of my Predecessors, who had intended “to do everything possible to ensure that all those who truly possessed the desire for unity would find it possible to remain in this unity or to rediscover it anew”,[12] has often been seriously disregarded. An opportunity offered by St. John Paul II and, with even greater magnanimity, by Benedict XVI, intended to recover the unity of an ecclesial body with diverse liturgical sensibilities, was exploited to widen the gaps, reinforce the divergences, and encourage disagreements that injure the Church, block her path, and expose her to the peril of division.
At the same time, I am saddened by abuses in the celebration of the liturgy on all sides. In common with Benedict XVI, I deplore the fact that “in many places the prescriptions of the new Missal are not observed in celebration, but indeed come to be interpreted as an authorization for or even a requirement of creativity, which leads to almost unbearable distortions”.[13] But I am nonetheless saddened that the instrumental use of Missale Romanum of 1962 is often characterized by a rejection not only of the liturgical reform, but of the Vatican Council II itself, claiming, with unfounded and unsustainable assertions, that it betrayed the Tradition and the “true Church”. The path of the Church must be seen within the dynamic of Tradition “which originates from the Apostles and progresses in the Church with the assistance of the Holy Spirit” (DV 8). A recent stage of this dynamic was constituted by Vatican Council II where the Catholic episcopate came together to listen and to discern the path for the Church indicated by the Holy Spirit. To doubt the Council is to doubt the intentions of those very Fathers who exercised their collegial power in a solemn manner cum Petro et sub Petro in an ecumenical council,[14] and, in the final analysis, to doubt the Holy Spirit himself who guides the Church.
DRAMMATICHE IMMAGINI DELL’EFFETTO DEI VACCINI MRNA (PFITZER e MODERNA)
sulla sinistra: sangue normale su vetrino per microscopio, rappresentato da globuli rossi, prima della vaccinazione.
sulla destra: analoga immagine effettuata giorni dopo la vaccinazione. Le formazioni tubulari a sinistra in basso sembrano simili ai tubuli di ossido di graphene gia’ osservati da altri ricercatori (si tratta di glòbuli rossi collassati e aggregati assieme). Gli altri globuli rossi isolati appaiono fortemente distorti. Vi sono inoltre dei “bright spots”, probabilmente globuli bianchi, che stranamente reagiscono alla luce emettendo una forte luminosita’.
EVIDENZA DI BRIGHT SPOTS (VACCINO MODERNA)
