

Fondamenti logici della filosofia, filosofia della scienza, rapporti con la teologia






Thu Nov 4, 2021 – 7:36 am EDT
(Turning Point Project) – The Abrahamic Family House is scheduled to open in Abu Dhabi in 2022. It will consist of three main buildings — a mosque, a church, and a synagogue. A project of the Higher Committee of Human Fraternity (HCHF), the Abrahamic Family House was inspired by the 2019 Document on Human Fraternity signed by Pope Francis and Grand Imam Ahmed el-Tayeb. According to the Chairman of the HCHF, the site “epitomizes interfaith harmonious coexistence and preserves the unique character of each religion.”
The main push for harmonizing the three Abrahamic faiths comes from Pope Francis. He has long advocated for various religions to unite under common beliefs and values. The hitch is that the common beliefs and values described in the Document on Human Fraternity are mostly humanistic values — tolerance, acceptance, fraternity, mutual understanding, and so forth. God is mentioned frequently, but He is a generic God. He has created all human beings equally and wants them to live together in peace and harmony as brothers and sisters.
At the same time, however, the document asserts that “the pluralism and the diversity of religions…are willed by God.” This raises an important question. If God wants all people to live together in fraternity and harmony, why did He create a “diversity of religions”? After all, a great many bloody wars have been fought over religious differences.
The document doesn’t really answer this question. Rather, it pretends that, despite their diversity, all religions are more or less the same; all teach peace, equality, and freedom. When bad things happen, it’s not the fault of religion but of “deviation from the teachings of religions.”
Although the publicity for the Abrahamic Family House says that “the unique character of each religion” will be preserved, that seems unlikely. What seems more likely is a watering down of the unique character of each religion. That already seems to have happened.
For example, the Document on Human Fraternity makes no mention of the fact that Christians believe that God is a Trinity. There is also no mention of Jesus Christ, the Second Person of the Trinity who came to earth to reveal these and other truths to mankind. The “unique character” of Christianity is that it was founded by Christ, the Son of God.
Yet, belief in the Trinity and in the divinity of Christ is not shared by Jews and Muslims. In fact, the religion of Islam vehemently rejects these beliefs. So, the price of entry into the Abrahamic House is to de-emphasize the central elements of your faith. At least, that is the price that Francis seems willing to pay. Whether or not Jews and Muslims will dilute their faiths correspondingly is another matter.
Will Francis and his followers succeed in watering down Christianity sufficiently so that it can blend smoothly with other religions? Fortunately, there is good reason to think that they won’t succeed. The main obstacle to the success of the syncretic project is an itinerant preacher from Galilee named Jesus. His clear teachings are the greatest impediment to syncretism. The claim that, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life” is not conducive to interreligious compromise.
Likewise, the assertion that “no one comes to the Father but by me” (John 14:6) does not suggest that plurality and diversity of religions are willed by God.
Reading the Gospels, one does not get the impression that God willed a diversity of religions. On the contrary, it seems quite obvious that God willed one particular religion and sent His Son to establish it on earth. The “unique character” of Christianity is not that it teaches love of neighbor and charity toward the poor — other religions do the same. Its unique character is that it was founded by God in person.
Admittedly, the Christian claim seems boastful at first glance. And if Christ’s claim about Himself was untrue, that would make Him not only a boastful fraud but also dangerously deceptive — indeed, one of the worst people of all time. As C.S. Lewis and others have observed, if Christ was not God, then He was either a colossal liar or a lunatic. But, to abbreviate Lewis’ argument, Christ seems to be neither crazy nor deceitful, so we must accept the conclusion that He is God. After all, that is what He claimed — not just once or twice, but over and over, directly and indirectly.
Moreover, Christ brought His message to a people — monotheistic Jews — who would instinctively resist any man’s claim to be God. Let us recall that the Jews of the Roman era were a far more skeptical lot than modern-day Americans, many of whom seem disposed to swallow whatever “woke” fantasy is currently in fashion.
Yet it was among these hard-to-convince first-century Jews that many came to believe the astonishing claims made by Jesus. We tend to forget just how astonishing those claims were and are. As I wrote ten years ago:
Imagine how it would sound for any other man, even a great man, to talk about himself the way Christ did. How would it sound if Socrates had said, “Before Abraham came to be, I am”? Or if George Washington had said, “He who lives and believes in me shall never die”? Or if Winston Churchill had said “Your sins are forgiven you”? The answer? It would sound crazy in the extreme.… The strange thing is that, in the case of Christ, the claims don’t seem quite so crazy. In His case, the words do seem to fit the man. (Christianity, Islam, and Atheism, p. 137)
Of course, it wasn’t only the words that convinced people that Jesus was truly the Son of God. The words were backed up by miracles — many of them. And there must have been something else — some extraordinary power of personality.
Msgr. Ronald Knox put it this way: “What was the magic of voice or look that drew them [the apostles] away in those early days when no miracles had yet been done, when the campaign of preaching had not yet been opened?” It must have been, Knox suggests, “the tremendous impact which his force of character made on people” (The Hidden Stream, p. 107).
The question is this: If you believe in the power, authority, and divinity of Christ, and if you believe in His startling claim that He is the only way to the Father, why would you want to simply dialogue with members of other faiths? Shouldn’t you want to convert them? Likewise, why would you want to form a unity of religions in which each retains its “unique character”? Wouldn’t you want to convert those other religions to the Church established by Christ?
That seems to be what Christ desired when He told His apostles, “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 28:19).
Yet Pope Francis and others in the Church’s leadership don’t seem terribly interested in making converts to Christ. In Evangelii Gaudium, Francis seems to exempt both Jews and Muslims from any need to convert. He once told a group of Muslim migrants that they should find comfort in the Koran. Another time, he advised Catholics in Morocco that “Conversion is not your mission.” And he told atheist journalist Eugenio Scalfari that “proselytism is solemn nonsense.”
In 2014, he told a group of Protestants, “I’m not interested in converting Evangelicals to Catholicism.” On another occasion, he criticized the ordinariate established by Benedict XVI for Anglicans who wish to become Catholics. Francis said they should remain as Anglicans.
In that regard, it was recently reported that “efforts were made at the highest level of the Vatican to dissuade 72-year-old Nazir-Ali from converting to Catholicism.” Dr. Michael Nazir-Ali, the former Anglican bishop of Rochester, England, recently converted to Catholicism. The most likely reason for the efforts to dissuade him is that Dr. Nazir-Ali is a strong critic of Islamic sharia. Furthermore, he felt the Church of England was not doing enough to convert Muslims. According to a clerical source cited by Church Militant, “Nazir-Ali isn’t the kind of convert we are looking for under the Francis pontificate.”
“Not the kind of convert we are looking for”? One sometimes gets the impression that the Church under Pope Francis isn’t looking for any converts at all. Why bother to convert when all religions are roughly the same? And, make no mistake, the sameness of all religions is one of the basic assumptions undergirding the Document on Human Fraternity (which, by the way, looks very much as though it was written in Rome rather than in Cairo.) Here’s a typical passage:
This Document…upholds…the firm conviction that authentic teachings of religions invite us to remain rooted in the values of peace; to defend the values of mutual understanding, human fraternity and harmonious coexistence; to re-establish wisdom, justice and love…
All of this sounds more like one of those Humanist Manifestos of the last century than like a document written by men who are on fire with the love of God. Religion? Any one will do—as long as it’s committed to humanist values.
As for the violent commands of Muhammad and the exclusive demands of Jesus? Well, as the document says, “Dialogue among believers means coming together in the vast space of spiritual, human and shared social values.” But perhaps the space for dialogue is not so vast after all. The document goes on to say, “It [dialogue] also means avoiding unproductive discussions.” Hmm. It’s a good bet that all those astonishing claims that Jesus made about Himself fall under the category of “unproductive discussions.”
Indeed, if your aim is the creation of a one-world humanistic religion, then about 90 percent of the New Testament is “unproductive.” Not to mention the significant percentage of the Koran that does not fit into a humanistic framework.

Ps 109:4
V. Tu es sacérdos in ætérnum, secúndum órdinem Melchísedech. Allelúia.
Matt 25:14-23
In illo témpore: Dixit Iesus discípulis suis parábolam hanc: Homo peregre proficíscens vocávit servos suos, et trádidit illis bona sua. Et uni dedit quinque talénta, álii autem duo, álii vero unum, unicuíque secúndum própriam virtútem, et proféctus est statim.
Oggi ricordiamo la grande figure di San Carlo Borromeo. Il Vangelo di oggi riguarda la parabola dei talenti. Sembra ritagliato su misura sui pastori cui e’ stato affidato tanto. Hanno ricevuto doni particolari per rivestire gli ordini religiosi. Proprio perche’ il Signore li ha scelti come guide. Nel corso della vita scopre i talenti che gli sono stati dati, cinque, due o uno solo. Ma per i servi fedeli il Signore riserva la gloria del Paradiso.
San Carlo Borromeo ha certamente impiegato proficuamente i suoi talenti. Fece del bene come sacerdote, vescovo e cardinale, portando la predicazione anche nei paesi piu’ sperduti di montagna. Portava la dottrina ovunque e confermava nelle fede il popolo di Cristo in un tempo in cui vi era l’eresia protestante.
E’ rappresentato con un capestro al collo. Perche’ al tempo della peste portava la corda per indicare che lui era servo di Cristo! La peste era una vera pandemia in cui piu’ della meta’ della popolazione moriva dopo atroci sofferenze (la peste bubbonica).
La Chiesa oggi si deve riprendere a partire dai pastori. Adesso il clero e’ addormentato. Di fronte alla pandemia la Chiesa deve ripartire dai sacerdoti. I quali non possono seguire la falsa chiesa di satana, ingannando i fedeli.
I sacerdoti devono seguire la donna dell’Apocalisse, la Donna Vestita di Sole, la Vergine Celeste! I sacerdoti devono uscire nel deserto seguendo la Beata Vergine Maria, imitando l’esempio di San Carlo Borromeo!
Sia lodato Gesu’ Cristo! Sempre sia lodato!
____________________
(*) Questo commento e’ scritto in tempo reale durante l’omelia. Mi scuso per l’eventuale misinterpretazione delle parole di Don Enrico.
Ps 109: 4 V. Tu es sacérdos in ætérnum, secúndum órdinem Melchísedech. Alleluia.
Matt 25: 14-23 In illo témpore: Dixit Iesus discípulis suis parábolam hanc: Homo peregre proficíscens vocávit servos suos, et trádidit illis bona sua. Et uni dedit quinque talénta, álii autem duo, álii vero unum, unicuíque secúndum própriam virtútem, et proféctus est statim.
Today we remember the great figure of San Carlo Borromeo.
Today’s Gospel concerns the parable of the talents. It seems tailor-made on the shepherds to whom so much has been entrusted. They received special gifts to hold religious orders. Precisely because the Lord has chosen them as guides.
Throughout his life, he [the priest] discovers the talents he has been given, five, two, or just one. But for the faithful servants the Lord reserves the glory of Heaven.
San Carlo Borromeo certainly used his talents profitably. He did good as a priest, bishop and cardinal, bringing preaching to even the most remote mountain villages.
He carried the doctrine everywhere and confirmed the faith of the people of Christ in a time when there was a Protestant heresy. He is represented with a halter around his neck. Because at the time of the plague he wore the rope to indicate that he was Christ’s servant!
The plague was a real pandemic in which more than half of the population died after excruciating suffering (the bubonic plague). The Church today must recover starting from the pastors.
Now the clergy is asleep. In the face of the pandemic, the Church must restart from the priests. Who cannot follow the false church of satan, deceiving the faithful. Priests must follow the woman of the Apocalypse, the Woman Clothed with the Sun, the Celestial Virgin!
Priests must go out into the desert following the Blessed Virgin Mary, imitating the example of St. Charles Borromeo!
Praised be Jesus Christ! Always be praised!
________________
(**) This document is written in real time while the homily is taking place. I escuse myself for any possible misinterpretation of the words by Don Enrico.

Questi sono i concetti espressi durante un intervento tv dal Prof. Giuliano Di Bernardo, già Gran Maestro del Grande Oriente d’Italia, (1990-’93). Dimessosi dal GOI per le infiltrazioni mafiose da lui stesso denunciate, fondatore di un’altra obbedienza, la Gran Loggia Regolare d’Italia, alla fine, scandalizzato dai rapporti che si tessevano ovunque tra logge, mafia e ‘ndrangheta, ha lasciato del tutto la Massoneria.
L’ex Gran Maestro ci offre un chiaro panorama di riferimento per capire quello che sta succedendo.
Vi proponiamo lo “sbobinamento” completo del suo intervento registrato durante la trasmissione televisiva “Segnalibro” andata in onda su Telerama il 15 agosto 2020 (a partire dal minuto 7:20).
I massoni non di rado cedono alla tentazione di divulgare in pubblico le loro teorie e i loro segreti, magari creando qualche imbarazzo. (Un po’ come quando nel 2015 il cardinale superbergogliano Godfried Danneels, confermò, tutto compiaciuto, alla tv belga di appartenere alla “Mafia di San Gallo”, la lobby di cardinali modernisti e in odore di massoneria ecclesiastica che volevano cacciare Benedetto XVI. Affermazioni gravissime, che tiravano in causa scomuniche per tutti: infatti, poi, sparì di scena, [chissà perché?] fino alla sua morte avvenuta nel 2019).
Comunque, per chi avesse ancora qualche dubbio su quello che sta succedendo, ascolti il prof. Di Bernardo:
* * *
“Noi dobbiamo vedere già una prima forma di globalizzazione nella costituzione dei regni. Un popolo che parla la stessa lingua, la stessa cultura, la stessa religione viene omogeneizzato.
Quando più regni formano l’impero avviene un’ulteriore omogeneizzazione e la globalizzazione altro non è che un processo di omogeneizzazione delle differenze umane.
In tempi recenti, la globalizzazione ha avuto una forte accelerata da parte della scienza e delle sue applicazioni tecnologiche e questo ha cambiato tutto.
Il fenomeno di globalizzazione ormai sta andando sempre più avanti ed è irreversibile per una ragione semplice: se sono la scienza e le applicazioni tecnologiche a spingere verso la globalizzazione del pianeta, bene, noi potremmo arrestare la globalizzazione fermando la scienza. Lei pensa che questo sia possibile?
La scienza andrà avanti e più la scienza va avanti più ci sarà globalizzazione. Arriveremo a un punto in cui ci sarà una sola società su tutto il pianeta Terra e allora la domanda è: chi governerà questo “paese”, chi governerà questo mondo? Per ragioni che ho spiegato ampiamente nel libro non potrà essere la democrazia, la democrazia rivela tutte le sue debolezze e le sue contraddizioni.
La società completamente globalizzata sarà governata da colui che ho chiamato l’UNO, ma questo che cosa significa? Significa che i fenomeni che oggi noi stiamo affrontando potranno trovare soluzione soltanto all’interno di una società governata dall’UNO.
La pandemia, ecco, la pandemia è un ulteriore fattore di accelerazione verso la società globalizzata dell’UNO dio, perché? Perché la pandemia di cui parliamo oggi non è l’eccezione, ma è la regola.
Noi ci dobbiamo aspettare, in tempi brevi, altre pandemie che metteranno a rischio la sopravvivenza dell’umanità.
Allora dobbiamo trovare il modo, che non è quello di evitare le pandemie, ma quello di controllarle e allora dobbiamo vedere quali forme di governo consentono di controllare le pandemie.
Rispetto al futuro da me ipotizzato, che è quello dell’UNO-dio, oggi noi abbiamo una piccola anticipazione nel nostro presente, rappresentato appunto dalla Cina.
Per noi osservatori occidentali, quasi sempre distratti, la Cina sta creando condizioni del tutto particolari. Il presidente è stato eletto a vita, il che significa che per tutta la sua vita può dare quella impostazione che lui desidera per la Cina e per tutto il pianeta.
Non ha, quindi, le interruzioni previste dalla democrazia, ma proprio per questo avendo a disposizione la scienza, la tecnologia, l’intelligenza artificiale e tutto ciò che rappresenta le potenzialità scientifiche, è veramente UN DIO CHE PUÒ FARE TUTTO, che ha un potere assoluto, ecco perché io l’ho chiamato l’UNO-dio, ma l’UNO-dio può governare con successo un popolo di 1miliardo e 400.000 mila individui anche perché questo popolo non ha una religione, ma ha una filosofia pratica che è il Confucianesimo”.
Ebbene, il prof. Di Bernardo è quello che il procuratore di Palmi Agostino Cordova ha definito “un fiore sulla palude della massoneria”. QUI al minuto 6:20. Se questi sono i programmi ideologici del “fiore”, potrete avere una caratura immediata di quali siano i programmi della “palude”.
P.S. In un’intervista del febbraio 2016, il quotidiano Libero ha fatto a Di Bernardo la domanda: “Qual è il suo prototipo di tiranno illuminato?”. Il professore ha risposto: “Se devo indicare un nome, direi il Papa“.
A posto così.
Fonte:
byoblu.com/…nita-ci-vuole-il-governo-delluno-dio-come-in-cina/

Evangelium
Matt 25:14-23
In illo témpore: Dixit Iesus discípulis suis parábolam hanc: Homo peregre proficíscens vocávit servos suos, et trádidit illis bona sua. Et uni dedit quinque talénta, álii autem duo, álii vero unum, unicuíque secúndum própriam virtútem, et proféctus est statim. Abiit autem, qui quinque talénta accéperat, et operátus est in eis, et lucrátus est ália quinque. Simíliter et, qui duo accéperat, lucrátus est ália duo. Qui autem unum accéperat, ábiens fodit in terram, et abscóndit pecúniam dómini sui. Post multum vero témporis venit dóminus servórum illórum, et pósuit ratiónem cum eis. Et accédens qui quinque talénta accéperat, óbtulit alia quinque talénta, dicens:Dómine, quinque talénta tradidísti mihi, ecce, alia quinque superlucrátus sum. Ait illi dóminus eius: Euge, serve bone et fidélis, quia super pauca fuísti fidélis, super multa te constituam: intra in gáudium dómini tui. Accéssit autem et qui duo talénta accéperat, et ait: Dómine, duo talénta tradidísti mihi, ecce, ália duo lucrátus sum. Ait illi dóminus eius: Euge, serve bone et fidélis, quia super pauca fuísti fidélis, super multa te constítuam: intra in gáudium dómini tui.
Gospel Matt 25:14-23
At that time, Jesus spoke this parable to His disciples: “A man going abroad, called his servants and handed over his goods to them. And to one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one, to each according to his particular ability, and then he went on his journey. And he who had received the five talents went and traded with them, and gained five more. In like manner, he who had received the two gained two more. But he who had received the one went away and dug in the earth and hid his master’s money. Then after a long time the master of those servants came and settled accounts with them. And he who had received the five talents came and brought five other talents, saying, ‘Master, you handed over to me five talents; behold, I have gained five others in addition.’ His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; because you have been faithful over a few things, I will set you over many; enter into the joy of your master.’ And he also who had received the two talents came, and said, ‘Master, you handed over to me two talents; behold, I have gained two more.’ His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; because you have been faithful over a few things, I will set you over many; enter into the joy of your master.

Ps 109:4
V. Tu es sacérdos in ætérnum, secúndum órdinem Melchísedech. Allelúia.
Matt 25:14-23
In illo témpore: Dixit Iesus discípulis suis parábolam hanc: Homo peregre proficíscens vocávit servos suos, et trádidit illis bona sua. Et uni dedit quinque talénta, álii autem duo, álii vero unum, unicuíque secúndum própriam virtútem, et proféctus est statim.
Oggi ricordiamo la grande figure di San Carlo Borromeo. Il Vangelo di oggi riguarda la parabola dei talenti. Sembra ritagliato su misura sui pastori cui e’ stato affidato tanto. Hanno ricevuto doni particolari per rivestire gli ordini religiosi. Proprio perche’ il Signore li ha scelti come guide. Nel corso della vita scopre i talenti che gli sono stati dati, cinque, due o uno solo. Ma per i servi fedeli il Signore riserva la gloria del Paradiso.
San Carlo Borromeo ha certamente impiegato proficuamente i suoi talenti. Fece del bene come sacerdote, vescovo e cardinale, portando la predicazione anche nei paesi piu’ sperduti di montagna. Portava la dottrina ovunque e confermava nelle fede il popolo di Cristo in un tempo in cui vi era l’eresia protestante.
E’ rappresentato con un capestro al collo. Perche’ al tempo della peste portava la corda per indicare che lui era servo di Cristo! La peste era una vera pandemia in cui piu’ della meta’ della popolazione moriva dopo atroci sofferenze (la peste bubbonica).
La Chiesa oggi si deve riprendere a partire dai pastori. Adesso il clero e’ addormentato. Di fronte alla pandemia la Chiesa deve ripartire dai sacerdoti. I quali non possono seguire la falsa chiesa di satana, ingannando i fedeli.
I sacerdoti devono seguire la donna dell’Apocalisse, la Donna Vestita di Sole, la Vergine Celeste! I sacerdoti devono uscire nel deserto seguendo la Beata Vergine Maria, imitando l’esempio di San Carlo Borromeo!
Sia lodato Gesu’ Cristo! Sempre sia lodato!
____________________
(*) Questo commento e’ scritto in tempo reale durante l’omelia. Mi scuso per l’eventuale misinterpretazione delle parole di Don Enrico.
Ps 109: 4 V. Tu es sacérdos in ætérnum, secúndum órdinem Melchísedech. Alleluia.
Matt 25: 14-23 In illo témpore: Dixit Iesus discípulis suis parábolam hanc: Homo peregre proficíscens vocávit servos suos, et trádidit illis bona sua. Et uni dedit quinque talénta, álii autem duo, álii vero unum, unicuíque secúndum própriam virtútem, et proféctus est statim.
Today we remember the great figure of San Carlo Borromeo.
Today’s Gospel concerns the parable of the talents. It seems tailor-made on the shepherds to whom so much has been entrusted. They received special gifts to hold religious orders. Precisely because the Lord has chosen them as guides.
Throughout his life, he [the priest] discovers the talents he has been given, five, two, or just one. But for the faithful servants the Lord reserves the glory of Heaven.
San Carlo Borromeo certainly used his talents profitably. He did good as a priest, bishop and cardinal, bringing preaching to even the most remote mountain villages.
He carried the doctrine everywhere and confirmed the faith of the people of Christ in a time when there was a Protestant heresy. He is represented with a halter around his neck. Because at the time of the plague he wore the rope to indicate that he was Christ’s servant!
The plague was a real pandemic in which more than half of the population died after excruciating suffering (the bubonic plague).
The Church today must recover starting from the pastors. Now the clergy is asleep. In the face of the pandemic, the Church must restart from the priests. Who cannot follow the false church of satan, deceiving the faithful. Priests must follow the woman of the Apocalypse, the Woman Clothed with the Sun, the Celestial Virgin!
Priests must go out into the desert following the Blessed Virgin Mary, imitating the example of St. Charles Borromeo!
Praised be Jesus Christ! Always be praised!
________________
(**) This document is written in real time while the homily is taking place. I escuse myself for any possible misinterpretation of the words by Don Enrico.





L’articolo afferma che e’ facile giudicare irrilevante “Il Sinodo per una Chiesa Sinodale”. Infatti tutto nel Sinodo appare semplicemente ridicolo (**). Cominciando dal fatto che ogni cosa sembra concepita apposta per umiliare il Corpo Mistico di Gesu’ Cristo, partendo dalla premessa che Dio ha fatto le cose giuste ma che ora all’uomo peccatore pare sia giunto il momento per tentare di dire la sua (SIC!). Ma il risultato e’ gia’ prevedibile: inevitabilmente sara’ nient’altro che una falsa chiesa umana, una chiesa creata dal consenso degli uomini e non da Dio.
Nel suo libro “The Catechism of the Crisis in the Church” Fr. Matthias Gaudron descrive il difetto (la colpa) principale del Sindono: il processo in cui il giudizio personale conduce a sostituire alla fede soprannaturale una fede puramente umana e quindi inevitabilmente falsa, visto che non ci e’ dato di attingere al trascendente e al soprannaturale.
Pertanto lo stesso processo Sinodale condurra’ inevitabilmente a una fede differente. Cio’ in quanto fede puramente umana, seppur con qualche lontana somiglianza con il cattolicesimo.
So the very process of the Synodal path would lead to a different faith because it will be a human faith, even if it has some resemblance to Catholicism.
The Synodal path began in hell and leads to hell.
Indeed, during sane periods of Church history, Catholics would have been forbidden to participate in such an unholy and dangerous spectacle.
Above all else, though, we need to become saints, now.
_____________________
(1) The Synodal Path of Diabolical Disorientation, by Robert Morrison , Nov.2, 2021, https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/fetzen-fliegen/item/5677-the-synodal-path-of-diabolical-disorientation
(*) A NationalCatholic Newspaper established in 1967, USA.
(**) Anche qui si pone la domanda CHI SECONDO VOI E’ IL VERO COMICO?